5/11/2023 0 Comments Two weeks worth if walking papers![]() On Monday, Russian plans for a cease-fire to allow civilian evacuations were rejected as "completely immoral" by Ukrainian officials, after it emerged that the evacuation routes Russia planned to open would lead to Russian or Belarusian territory. News agency Interfax reported that evacuation routes would take civilians "from Kyiv, Chernihiv, Sumy, Kharkiv, Mariupol to Russia," citing Russia's National Defense Control Center. But evacuation routes will lead to Russia. The Russian military on Tuesday declared a fresh cease-fire in five Ukrainian cities, according to state-run media. "We have had a team of journalists in Ukraine and the region bearing witness to the unfolding conflict," he wrote. Slackman vowed that the Times would continue its "live, robust coverage" of the invasion. "The safety of our staff in Russia remains our number one priority." "We will tell this crucial part of the story independently and impartially, adhering to the BBC's strict editorial standards," a representative for the UK outlet said. The BBC, however, reversed its decision to cease reporting from inside Russia. The Times' decision follows similar moves by other non-Russian media outlets. Russia's new media law threatens potential violators with as many as 15 years in prison. Putin's 22 years in power, pushing through a law that effectively criminalizes independent news reporting about the war against Ukraine," Slackman wrote in a note to Times staff. "Russian authorities are clamping down harder on news and free speech than at any time during President Vladimir V. The decision was revealed in a tweet Tuesday from Times Deputy Managing Editor Clifford Levy, who shared an announcement from Michael Slackman, another top editor at the paper. The New York Times is pulling its journalists from Russia as Vladimir Putin's government cracks down on media outlets that refuse to toe the Kremlin's line on the war in Ukraine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |